英文信件开头的客套话
(共3篇)
以下是网友分享的关于英文信件开头的客套话的资料3篇,希望对您有所帮助,就爱阅读感谢您的支持。
英文投稿信的客套话篇1
英文投稿信的客套话
一、投稿信
往国外杂志投稿, 就是写COVER LETTER,主要内容应该有:
简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义,拟投期刊,对稿件处理有无特殊要求等(如“not to review” list)。另外,请附上主要作者的中文姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail 地址。此外有的杂志要求推荐几位审稿人及其。以及谁已经阅读过该文(当然是牛人)。
最后给一个模板:
Dear Dr. 主编name:
We submit our manuscript entitled “ 文章title” to 杂志名for publication. 接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义,不易过多,但要突出新意和关键点。All authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration.
Sincerely yours,
通讯作者
[search]投稿信[/search]
1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of intere st to the journal’s readers.
英文信件结尾
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb.
All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as
yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not,
we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors,
It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledg
e of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to
specialist journal such as –
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summariz
ed in T able 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when